The question was closed as too broad
As one of the close voters, I stand by my initial vote. You left four enumerated criteria:
- Ink must be refillable
- Wireless
- Scanner would be nice
- "Cheap as possible"
I left you the following comment:
I voted to close this as a broad question. Your requirements are a good start, but they still leave you with a wide variety of wireless printers to choose from. Have you performed any searches yourself and ruled out specific printers? If so, what and why? That will help us narrow down a list of options. Additionally, a budget for your printer would be helpful too.
To which you responded:
I updated the question. I've heard an epson printer satisfy this category.
Your update was to put the "cheap as possible" requirement. This knocked it into the Reopen queue, where it failed to garner the votes to reopen. Your update doesn't address the point I was making in the comments. Your requirements are very broad and if we were to go perform a general search for you (which isn't what we do), we'd get back a number of results you've possibly looked at already. Your comment mentions that Epson has printers that may meet your criteria, but you don't mention why you've reject those. If we find Epson printers, or someone has a user testimonial about an Epson printer, it's a waste of both their time and your time, because it seems you've rejected them already, but we don't know why.
Finally, the question was deleted automatically by the system on April 18th.
It was deleted because it met the criteria of an RemoveAbandonedClosed
question:
If the question was closed more than 9 days ago, and ...
- not closed as a duplicate
- has a score of 0 or less
- is not locked
- has no answers with a score > 0
- has no accepted answer
- has no pending reopen votes
- has not been edited in the past 9 days
... it will be automatically deleted. These are "abandoned closed", and show as RemoveAbandonedClosed
: